¿ë¾î ] ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý ] ÇöȲ ] ¹ß»ý¿øÀΠ] ºÐ¸¸ ] º´¿ø°¨¿° ] ôÃß¼ö¼ú ] Áø·á°ú¸ñº° ºÐ·ù ] ÀÇ·á ÇàÀ§º° ºÐ·ù ] Áúȯº° ºÐ·ù ] °ú½Ç À¯Çüº° ºÐ·ù ] ´ëÃ¥ ] ÀÇÇÐÀû ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤·Ð ] ¹æ¾îÁø·á ] ÆÇ·Ê ] ¼Ò¼Û¿ÜÀû ºÐÀïÇØ°á ] ÀÇ·áºÐÀïÁ¶Á¤¹ý ] ÀÇ»çÀÇ ¹ýÀû Àǹ« ] ȯÀÚÃøÀÇ ½ÃÀ§ ] ÀÇ·á¹ý·ü ] ¹ý·ü ] ±âÃÊÀÇÇР] ÀÌ»ó¼Ò°ß ] ÀÓ»óÀÇÇР] Áõ·Ê ] ´ºÁú·£µå ] ¹Ì±¹ ] µ¶ÀÏ ] ¿µ±¹ ] ¿À½ºÆ®·¹Àϸ®¾Æ ] ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ ] ÀϺ» ] Áß±¹ ] ÇÁ¶û½º ] [ Ä³³ª´Ù ] ±âŸ ±¹°¡ ] °ü·Ã¹®Çå ] ÀÇ·á¼Ò¼Û ] °Ë»ö ] Medical malpractice ] Kunstfehler in Deutschland ]

¡¡

[ÇöÀçÀ§Ä¡]: Ȩ> ij³ª´Ù

ij³ª´Ù Canada

»ç¹ýÁ¦µµ ] °ü·Ã¹®Çå ]

¡¡
Google
  • "ij³ª´Ù ÀÇ»çµéÀº ÀüÀûÀ¸·Î CMPA(The Canadian Medical Protective Association)¿¡ °¡ÀԵǾî ÀÖ°í, ¿©±â¼­ °ÅÀÇ ¸ðµç ÀÇ·á°ú¿À¹®Á¦¸¦ Ä¿¹öÇØÁÖ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±×»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÀÇ»çµéÀÌ º´¿ø¿¡¼­ ºÎ´çÇÑ ´ë¿ì¸¦ ¹ÞÀ» °æ¿ì, ÀÇ»çÁ¶ÇÕÀÇ Àû±ØÀû µµ¿òÀ» ¹Þ´Â´Ù."   

    • http://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/  - The Canadian Medical Protective Association is a mutual defence organization for physicians who practise in Canada. Our raison d'être is to protect a member's integrity by providing services of the highest quality including legal defence, indemnification, risk management, educational programs and general advice.

  • "ij³ª´ÙÀÇ MLI¿ä±ÝÀº ¹Ì±¹Ã³·³ Àü¹®ºÐ¾ß¿Í Áö¿ª¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̰¡ Å©Áö¸¸, ´ëü·Î ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ 1/10 ±Ý¾×¿¡ ºÒ°úÇÏ´Ù. ±×¸®°í º¸Çè·áÀÇ 60%´Â Á¤ºÎ¿¡¼­ ÁöºÒÇØÁØ´Ù. ij³ª´Ù¼­ ´Ù³â°£ ¹æ»ç¼±°ú °³¿øÀ» Çϰí ÀºÅ𸦠¾ÕµÐ R¹Ú»çÀÇ ¿¬°£ ÀÇ·á°ú¿Àº¸Çè·á´Â 2,304 ij³ª´Ù´Þ·¯(ij³ª´Ù´Þ·¯´Â ¹Ì±¹´Þ·¯ÀÇ ¾à 0.7)ÀÌ¸ç ±×Áß 60%´Â Á¤ºÎ¿¡¼­ ÁöºÒÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡, °á±¹ º»ÀκδãÀº ¹Ì±¹ µ·À¸·Î ȯ»êÇØ¼­ ¿¬°£ ¾à 600´Þ·¯ ³»¿Ü°¡ µÈ´Ù."  @[¹Ì±¹ÀÇ·á°ú¿ÀÇöȲ°ú º¸ÇèÀ§±â-4]

  • ij³ª´Ù º´¿ø ÀÔ¿øÈ¯ÀÚµéÀÇ ÀÇ·á¼Õ»ó(adverse events) ¹ß»ý·ü

    • ¿¬°£ 250¸¸ ÀÔ¿øÈ¯ÀÚÀÇ 7.5%·Î ȯÀÚ¼ö·Î ȯ»êÇÏ¸é ¿¬°£ 185,000¸í¿¡ À̸£°í, ÀÌ Áß 70,000¸íÀº ¿¹¹æ°¡´ÉÇÑ ÀÇ·á¼Õ»óÀ̾ú´Ù.
    • ¹æ¹ý
      • 3,745 Àǹ«±â·ÏÀ» Á¶»ç.
      • 1,527°ÇÀÇ Àǹ«±â·Ï¿¡¼­ Çϳª ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¼±º°±âÁØÀÌ ¹ß°ßµÊ. ÀÌ Áß 255°Ç¿¡¼­ ÀÇ·á¼Õ»óÀÌ È®ÀεÊ.
    • Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004; 170 (11):1678-86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • ¾È°ú

    • http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/1990/vol2/html/1990scr2_0311.html - The appellant, an ophthalmologist, performed surgery on the respondent to remove a cataract from her right eye. After injecting a local anaesthetic into the retrobulbar muscles behind the eyeball, the appellant noticed a small discolouration, which he stated on discovery was a very small retrobulbar bleed. On palpitating the eye, he found that it was not hard, and there were no other signs of retrobulbar haemorrhage. After waiting thirty minutes he proceeded with the operation. Following the surgery there was blood in the vitreous chamber of the eye. When the chamber cleared some nine months later the appellant was able to see for the first time that the optic nerve had atrophied, resulting in a loss of sight in the respondent's right eye. One possible cause of optic nerve atrophy is pressure due to retrobulbar haemorrhage. Neither of the expert witnesses was able to state with certainty what caused the atrophy in this case or when it occurred. The trial judge accepted the expert evidence that where there is bleeding other than the obvious pinprick of the needle, the operation should not be continued. Relying on the decision of the House of Lords in McGhee v. National Coal Board, he concluded that the respondent had prima facie proved that the appellant's actions had caused her injury and that the appellant had not satisfied the onus that had shifted to him. The trial judge accordingly found the appellant liable in negligence. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal.¡¡

  • Âü°í¹®Çå ¹× À¥»çÀÌÆ®

    • Baker, G. R., Norton, P. G., Flintoft, V. (2004). Canadian Adverse Events Study. Can Med Assoc J 171: 834-834 [Full Text]
    • ij³ª´ÙÀÇ »ç¹ýÁ¦µµ¡´»ó¡µ ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¹ý·ü½Å¹®
    • ij³ª´ÙÀÇ »ç¹ýÁ¦µµ <ÇÏ>  ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¹ý·ü½Å¹®
    • The courts in Canada are organized in a four-tiered structure. The Supreme Court of Canada sits at the apex of the structure and, consistent with its role as "a General Court of Appeal for Canada", hears appeals from both the federal court system, headed by the Federal Court of Appeal and the provincial court systems, headed in each province by that province¡¯s Court of Appeal. In contrast to its counterpart in the United States, therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada functions as a national, and not merely federal, court of last resort.
  • ±âŸ °ü·Ã»çÀÌÆ® ¹× ¹®Çå

e ÀÇ·á»ç°í¿¬±¸¼Ò ¸ÞÀÏ
º» »çÀÌÆ®ÀÇ Á¤º¸´Â ¹Ì¿Ï¼ºÀ̸ç Âü°í¿ë¿¡ ºÒ°úÇÕ´Ï´Ù.